of the transcript at Docket #100  Judge Jarvis states to attorney James

W. Gentry representing Moose,  " They say they weren't involved in that

count." Jarvis awarded sanctions to Moose anyway.

    Judge Jarvis so intimidated Attorney Bradshaw, a young attorney, who

had requested to represent Oliver pro hac vice  (See Docket #89), that

Attorney Bradshaw breached and withdrew his contracted representation of

Oliver, refused to appeal the order awarding sanctions, and described in

his letter of January 29, 1993, to Oliver that: "...if he did appeal under

Rule 60(b), that the only logical result would be the levying of further

sanctions against both of us."

    Judge Jarvis has exceeded his authority and had ignored the laws

established by the Congress and the Environmental Protection Agency. Judge

Jarvis has joined a conspiracy with the defense attorneys (and others) to

obstruct and debase the administration of justice and to protect organized

crime.

    Judge Jarvis's actions against the health and welfare of the general

public and his willing violation of the constitutional rights of

Plaintiff/Appellant are absolutely proven herein.

    Plaintiff/Appellant submits the facts herein are more than sufficient

to support the definition of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" necessary for

the process of Impeachment of Judge Jarvis in the Congress of the United

States of America.


IV. What action do you want the Court to take in this case?

    a)   I respectfully request this Honorable Court to set aside the

Orders of Judge James H. Jarvis in Case No. 1:91-cv-354, and allow

                               16