to defend himself. Moreover no legal recourse is available to defend the

health and welfare of his community from the ORGANIZED CRIME of

Defendants/Appellees.

    d)  Plaintiff/Appellant wishes to raise the issue of why I was not

allowed to speak at the sanctions hearing to defend myself. Judge Jarvis

specifically stated at page 41, line 15, of the transcript at Docket #100,

thet Plaintiff/Appellant would not be allowed to talk about anything but

the sanctions. I was never allowed to have any discovery of any kind

thruoghout the entire case.  Furthermore my attorney Bob Bradshaw did not

object.

VI.  The challenge of Judge Jarvis and Defendants/Appellees as to the
     timeliness of Plaintiff/Appellant's Appeal.

        Judge Jarvis and Defendants/Appellees have both stated

that Appellant's appeal is untimely. Plaintiff/Appellant would like

to bring to the attention that Rule 60, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

specifically states that:

            "...This rule does not limit the power of a court to
            entertain an independent action to relieve a party
            from a judgement, order, or proceeding, or to grant
            relief to a defendant not actually personally
            notified as provided in Title 28,U.S.C., § 1655, or
            to set aside a judgement for fraud upon the court..."

    Plaintiff/Appellant has charged Judge Jarvis and Defendants/Appellees

with fraud and conspiracy against the Federal Court System and

Plaintiff/Appellant. The record herein  shows these allegations to be

absolutely true. All Statue of Limitation matters here are tolled due to

the continuing conspiracy, according to the authority of the Annotation

of the American Law Review, 97 A.L.R. 137, where a Federal Judge was

                                    19